thuê căn hộ tại Royal city

Democrats criticize the Supreme Court’s decision on abortion restrictions in Texas


Leading Democrats in Washington are intensifying their condemnation of Texas’ stringent abortion law, as well as the conservative Supreme Court majority that permitted it to take effect this week. President Joe Biden slammed the court ruling, which came down just before midnight Wednesday, as a “extraordinary assault on a woman’s constitutional rights” that will lead to “unconstitutional turmoil.”

Democrats criticize the Supreme Court’s decision on abortion restrictions in Texas

In a statement, Biden said, “For the majority to do this without a hearing, without the benefit of an opinion from a lower court, and without fair consideration of the facts, insults the rule of law and the rights of all Americans to seek redress from our courts.” Biden also stated that he has directed the Departments of Health and Human Services and Justice to look into other options for ensuring abortion access in Texas. Attorney General Merrick Garland stated that the law, also known as SB8, is “deeply concerning” to his department. In a statement, Garland said, “We are reviewing all possibilities to defend women’s constitutional rights, including access to abortion.” The protest on Thursday follows the Biden administration’s pledge this week to defend abortion rights in the United States, though it’s unclear what the administration can or will do in that regard. The Biden administration’s goal, according to White House press secretary Jen Psaki, is to “look for every resource, every lever at our disposal to ensure women in Texas have the capacity to seek health care.” She also chastised a male reporter for continually questioning how Biden’s public stance on abortion aligns with his Catholic faith, telling him, “I know you’ve never faced those options, nor have you ever been pregnant.”

“However, for women who have had to make those decisions, this is a very tough situation. The president believes that everyone’s right to privacy should be protected “she went on. The new law forbids abortions beyond six weeks of pregnancy, when many women are unaware they are pregnant, and empowers private citizens to enforce the rule by allowing them to file lawsuits against health practitioners or anybody who supports someone in obtaining an abortion after that period. The court’s majority concluded in an unsigned judgment that the legal issues created by SB8’s unique enforcement mechanism did not meet the legal standard required to reject the bill. The fundamental constitutionality of Texas’ law has yet to be determined by the courts. “The applicants now in front of us have raised serious concerns about the legality of the Texas law in question. However, their application raises complicated and novel antecedent procedural problems, which they have not addressed,” according to the decision. In response to the court’s judgment, Chief Justice John Roberts and all three of the court’s liberal justices submitted separate dissenting opinions, which is an extremely unusual move for a matter on the court’s so-called shadow docket. Texas’ statute, according to Roberts, is “not merely unique, but unprecedented,” and could serve as a “model” for other states to follow.

Proponents of abortion rights and Democrats

on the other hand, were significantly more forthright in their criticisms of the Supreme Court’s decision. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called it a “cowardly, late-night decision” and promised that when the House returns from recess, the Democratic majority will bring the Women’s Health Protection Act to the floor for a vote. SB8 is a disaster for Texas women, especially women of color and women from low-income neighborhoods, according to Pelosi. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), a co-sponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, criticized the Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday, calling the Texas law a “unprecedented” medical disaster for women. “Bounty hunters were essentially formed by them. They’ve made it up to individual citizens to report these incidents if a woman seeks an abortion after roughly six weeks “On CNN, Klobuchar stated. “Even if it damages a woman’s health, if it affects a woman’s life, the law does not allow for an exemption. It’s a terrible judgment, which is why there’s so much indignation in the dissent.” Klobuchar stated that Congress must enact legislation to codify Roe v. Wade. Klobuchar did not indicate if she thought Democrats would be able to pass such legislation, but she did reiterate her conviction that the filibuster should be repealed in order to move forward on legislative priorities. The subject of abortion has resurfaced in the national political consciousness even before the court’s recent decision.

Democrats and their allies have been emphasizing abortion access as part of their campaign to save California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is up for recall later this month. However, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s actions this week in other high-profile political races, such as Virginia’s gubernatorial race, where Democratic nominee Terry McAuliffe told POLITICO that it is likely to be “a huge motivator for individuals to come out and vote,” that emphasis has been amplified. Abortion has always been a source of contention for social conservatives, and Texas Republicans have showed no signs of backing down from the contentious new law. Gov. Greg Abbott, who is running for reelection next year, dismissed the possibility of corporate backlash in response to the abortion restrictions. In a CNBC interview on Thursday morning, Abbott stated, “This is not slowing down businesses coming to the state of Texas at all.” “In reality, it is hastening the process of firms migrating to Texas… they are leaving California, which is a highly liberal state.” Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a moderate who favors abortion rights, slammed the court decision enabling the measure to go into effect. She also called Texas’ measure “excessive” and “destructive.” Collins stated in a statement, “I oppose the Court’s decision to let the statute to continue in effect for the time being while these fundamental constitutional and procedural problems are resolved.”